Extended Range Shuttlecraft
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
Yeah, the speed limitation was my main interest in sketching up a new model. I mean Warp 5? I know I'm an impatient Californian driver, but I can't imagine that's fast enough for all applications.
Does the size of the warp coil determine the maximum speed? I mean, I can imagine a correlation - bigger means faster to a point. But I don't know if it's ever been made clear which characteristic most effects a ship's top speed. Nacelle size? Intermix levels? Size or quality of dilithium crystals? How much does weight matter? Maybe a faster ship is just more finely tuned, or has more high quality parts.
Let's look at it a different way. The warp drive system depends on two factors: 1) how greatly its warp field reduces the ship's mass/gravitational constant; and 2) how much force the engines can apply to move the reduced-mass ship.
One side-question: warp drive doesn't work in reverse, does it?
Does the size of the warp coil determine the maximum speed? I mean, I can imagine a correlation - bigger means faster to a point. But I don't know if it's ever been made clear which characteristic most effects a ship's top speed. Nacelle size? Intermix levels? Size or quality of dilithium crystals? How much does weight matter? Maybe a faster ship is just more finely tuned, or has more high quality parts.
Let's look at it a different way. The warp drive system depends on two factors: 1) how greatly its warp field reduces the ship's mass/gravitational constant; and 2) how much force the engines can apply to move the reduced-mass ship.
One side-question: warp drive doesn't work in reverse, does it?
"I have nothing to say, I am saying it, and that is poetry."
John Cage
John Cage
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
If you want a faster ship, a full starship would be a better bet. It doesn't have to be too big either - the Defiant was capable of warp 9+, even under normal circumstances, and 9.8 if she diverted power from tactical systems to structural integrity.Grundig wrote:Yeah, the speed limitation was my main interest in sketching up a new model. I mean Warp 5? I know I'm an impatient Californian driver, but I can't imagine that's fast enough for all applications.
All unknown. All we do know is that bigger ships tend to be faster.Does the size of the warp coil determine the maximum speed? I mean, I can imagine a correlation - bigger means faster to a point. But I don't know if it's ever been made clear which characteristic most effects a ship's top speed. Nacelle size? Intermix levels? Size or quality of dilithium crystals? How much does weight matter? Maybe a faster ship is just more finely tuned, or has more high quality parts.
Err, no. While mass-reduction is certainly a side-effect of the warp field, you're describing it as if its a newtonian form of propulsion. This can't be the case, for obvious reasons. How exactly warp drive works is unclear, but it certainly can't be a case of "reduce mass, exert force".Let's look at it a different way. The warp drive system depends on two factors: 1) how greatly its warp field reduces the ship's mass/gravitational constant; and 2) how much force the engines can apply to move the reduced-mass ship.
Actually it does - the E-nil reversed at warp in "The Corbomite Manoeuvre".One side-question: warp drive doesn't work in reverse, does it?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
Good point. But the Defiant isn't exactly a shuttle. I"m just talking about getting a small group of people somewhere fast. And a shuttlecraft would require less maintenance than a Defiant-type ship. Basically, the Defiant is a ship with a set crew (more or less), and the ERS would be a vehicle-for-hire in a shuttlebay.Captain Seafort wrote:
If you want a faster ship, a full starship would be a better bet. It doesn't have to be too big either - the Defiant was capable of warp 9+, even under normal circumstances, and 9.8 if she diverted power from tactical systems to structural integrity.
Actually I just remembered something; I don't know where it's from, but it's a neat idea. The idea is that warp fields themselves are continually reshaped so that they "tunnel" or "swim" through spacetime.Err, no. While mass-reduction is certainly a side-effect of the warp field, you're describing it as if its a newtonian form of propulsion. This can't be the case, for obvious reasons. How exactly warp drive works is unclear, but it certainly can't be a case of "reduce mass, exert force".
Well whaddya know?Actually it does - the E-nil reversed at warp in "The Corbomite Manoeuvre".
"I have nothing to say, I am saying it, and that is poetry."
John Cage
John Cage
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
That's my point. You can have a ship that's small and readily available, but slow, or one that's fast, but is much bigger and requires a bigger crew. Tiny and fast doesn't work in Trek (unless it runs on care bears and rainbows).Grundig wrote:Good point. But the Defiant isn't exactly a shuttle. I"m just talking about getting a small group of people somewhere fast. And a shuttlecraft would require less maintenance than a Defiant-type ship. Basically, the Defiant is a ship with a set crew (more or less), and the ERS would be a vehicle-for-hire in a shuttlebay.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 2 Star Admiral
- Posts: 8094
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
- Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
I can't remember if this is a canon definition, TM, or actual physics (I know it works with the later):
Warp Drive works by energizing the warp coils creating a warp field, the field distorts spacetime around the ship. It manipulates the fabric of space, pushing it away from it in one direction and pulling it towards it in another. An analagy would be a treadmill. The person on the machine doesn't move, they change the speed of the track beneth them to bring their destination to them.
Impulse Drive works by reducing the mass of the ship then using the vented plasma to achieve thrust.
So Warp Drive depends on Enstein's warping of space idea, Impulse is more Newtonian.
Warp Drive works by energizing the warp coils creating a warp field, the field distorts spacetime around the ship. It manipulates the fabric of space, pushing it away from it in one direction and pulling it towards it in another. An analagy would be a treadmill. The person on the machine doesn't move, they change the speed of the track beneth them to bring their destination to them.
Impulse Drive works by reducing the mass of the ship then using the vented plasma to achieve thrust.
So Warp Drive depends on Enstein's warping of space idea, Impulse is more Newtonian.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
The fact remains that in 'Trek, if you want starship speeds then you need... a starship.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
Not necessarily - The Emissary had K'Ehleyr being sent to the Enterprise in a probe (barely over 2 meters long). The unofficial first words out of her mouth after getting off the probe are probably, "Good to be aboard, where's the bathroom."Mikey wrote:The fact remains that in 'Trek, if you want starship speeds then you need... a starship.
I'll bet your shuttle was designed in response to that - whenever a Federation officer needed transportation from the Klingon empire, they sent the officer in a probe as payback.
Still, as to larger ships being faster 'inherently', I wonder if it is more along the lines of warp cross-section compared to ship power. I.e. 2 ships, the larger one is 2* as long, wide, and tall, meaning 8* greater volume. However, it only has 4* the cross section (height times width). So the larger ship would be able to put 2* as much power into its warp field as the smaller one, allowing higher speeds.
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
All true, but I don't recall it ever being stated that she travelled faster that way than a contemporary shuttle. The expressed reasons for that mode of travel were secrecy and subterfuge; as to gauging speed by her "holding it" for the length of the trip - IIRC, she was in stasis.Coalition wrote:Not necessarily - The Emissary had K'Ehleyr being sent to the Enterprise in a probe (barely over 2 meters long). The unofficial first words out of her mouth after getting off the probe are probably, "Good to be aboard, where's the bathroom."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
DATA : Apparently there were no starships available at Starbase one five three. The emissary is aboard a class eight probe.
RIKER : A class eight probe is just over two meters long!
PICARD : True, Number One. But if the sensors and transmitters were removed and life-support installed, there would be just enough space for one person.
RIKER : And those probes are designed to go warp nine.
The probe wasn't the fastest thing around, it was used because there were no ships available and it saved the E-D a two leg trip. It's also limited to warp 9, which is fast by shuttle standards, but not that fast compared to a ship.
RIKER : A class eight probe is just over two meters long!
PICARD : True, Number One. But if the sensors and transmitters were removed and life-support installed, there would be just enough space for one person.
RIKER : And those probes are designed to go warp nine.
The probe wasn't the fastest thing around, it was used because there were no ships available and it saved the E-D a two leg trip. It's also limited to warp 9, which is fast by shuttle standards, but not that fast compared to a ship.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
Well, I'm wrong about not knowing the speed, then. I still maintain that for typical passenger craft, the speed is limited by size. Otherwise, we'd have seen production high-warp shuttles.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
I'm sure they COULD design a shuttle that could go as fast as a ship..........but why?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
The question is: Why Not?Mark wrote:I'm sure they COULD design a shuttle that could go as fast as a ship..........but why?
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
I'd choose a shuttle flight precisely because I wanted to be alone - the last thing I'd want is to get there faster.
"You ain't gonna get off down the trail a mile or two, and go missing your wife or something, like our last cook done, are you?"
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
It all depends on where your going...kostmayer wrote:I'd choose a shuttle flight precisely because I wanted to be alone - the last thing I'd want is to get there faster.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2729
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
Re: Extended Range Shuttlecraft
I would say that while a fast civilian charter would be great, or simply some fast warp sleds, but there is one major thing: If these are designed to go that fast, it means they're probably going to go far, as well. There are two points why they may not be that practical: If I need to get somewhere THAT fast, I am more than likely going to the scene of an emergency, meaning I'd want more available than a shuttle. Similarly, if I were on a long range mission, I'd probably want greater protection than that of a shuttle. Meaning, as it has already been stated, you're likely to need a starship.
This being said, I'm still for specialization of ships. Shuttles are logical for short-range system craft, civilian use, yada yada. Not knocking the design at all.
This being said, I'm still for specialization of ships. Shuttles are logical for short-range system craft, civilian use, yada yada. Not knocking the design at all.
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?