How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Deep Space Nine
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I'm not too sure SW can really be used to gauge anything in this instance. Other sci-fi don't operate by the same rules as Trek. That includes industrial capacity. As was mentioned at the start of this thread Legend of The Galactic Heroes has fleets of hundreds of thousands being common, despite controlling just a portion of our galaxy. SW and 40K have notably less ships, despite each controlling a vastly greater region. Given how tech and construction methods are different in all sci-fi realms, any comparison seems rather pointless. The only real thing you could derive from that, I suppose, would be the "standard" fleet size per territory size from a literary point of view. But an in-universe analysis just seems off to me.

Welcome to the site, by the way. :)
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

We do have some indicators re Star Trek, though.

For example we know from 'Tacking Into the Wind' that the Klingons had at least 1,500 ships available - it could be a lot more, the dialogue isn't 100% clear, but it's at least 1,500 - whilst the combined Dominion fleet - Dominion proper, Cardassian and Breen - numbered 30,000 ships.

And since the Cardassians changing sides was a balance-tipping moment in the war, the Federation/Klingon/Romulan fleet realistically must have numbered somewhere between ten and twenty thousand.

And incidentally, the couple of hundred planets figure is, apparently, just the main ones. Including colonies, outposts and such there are thousands of worlds.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by McAvoy »

We also got the 900 Billion figure from Bashier as well. So at the very least we can assume a minimum of 1 trillion for a combined Klingon/Federation population.

I think DITL's 8,000 figure is reasonable perhaps a bit low. We could assume that the Klingons and the Federation both had 16,000 ships at the beginning of the war, with the Romulans adding another 4,000 to 6,000 ships.

The 1,500 ship figure could be in reference to what was available for an offensive and those not deployed in defensive positions. I am not sure but I'll have to watch it again.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

There is plenty of wiggle room in the 1,500. It's said in the context of the Breen energy damper; Martok says a Klingon ship proved invulnerable because of some minor deflector modification, and then said he'd ordered the entire fleet to be so modified before adding "By tomorrow, we'll have fifteen hundred Klingon vessels ready for deployment."

If anything it's actually quite likely that the 1,500 was only a part of the Klingon force.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I think it would be a safe bet that they couldn't upgrade the engines of the entire Klingon Fleet within a day. That 1,500 was most likely reffering to ships currently in drydock, just being flown out of assembly facilities, being repaired, stopped at a Starbase getting supplies, etc.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Agreed.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by McAvoy »

Well that makes sense.

Also if that is true, and IF the modification needs drydock work, then the Klingons have a very impressive infrastructure. Which in turn means so does the Federation.

But if they can do it underway, then it does give a good indication of the size of the Klingons. Assuming that the message on how to modify their ships were transmitted within a day or two throughout the fleet, ships that were undamaged at the time to be mobilized with the modification and those ships that were nearing completion of their reift/repair/construction. It would show that the current strength of the Klingon fleet could be around perhaps 3,000 to 5,000 ships at that time. But I am just throwing numbers.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Reliant121 »

Keep in mind that the AQ Alliance races all shared drydocks (evidence from the fact the Romulan's had a bitch about not getting any priority on drydock space in DS9 compared to a group of Klingon ships). Whether the Klingon's share drydock spaces with the Feds, let alone the Rommies, is an unknown; even more so with the Rommies sharing with the Feds/Klingons. However, happy go lucky SF might well share its docks with Klingons and Romulans, meaning that rather impressive turn out is probably not an indicator of what the Klingons themselves are capable of.
Coalition
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
Location: Georgia, United States
Contact:

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Coalition »

Reliant121 wrote:However, happy go lucky SF might well share its docks with Klingons and Romulans, meaning that rather impressive turn out is probably not an indicator of what the Klingons themselves are capable of.
And Section 31 taking notes the whole time, to be ready for the next war.
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Reliant121 »

SF itself would be entirely unawares, since Section 31 is an autonomous and unofficial entity AFAIK.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Reliant121 wrote:SF itself would be entirely unawares, since Section 31 is an autonomous and unofficial entity AFAIK.
That doesn't mean that they're invisible - Ross certainly knew about them, and the same probably goes for most of the Admiralty. Unavowed and autonomous does not mean unknown.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Reliant121 »

Indeed.

So much for high and mighty principles.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Deepcrush »

Reliant121 wrote:Indeed.

So much for high and mighty principles.
In war, principles more often then not give way to survival.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by McAvoy »

I agree. War is war. Only when you are winning can you go on the high and mighty road.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: How big SHOULD the Federation Fleet be?

Post by Deepcrush »

To hell with that, most of the time you just pretend you took the high road after the war. If you were the winner then its pretty easy to say since no one can say otherwise.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Post Reply