Rochey wrote:Then what stops it? Your father won't magicaly teleport away from you when you go to shoot him.
The only reason they couldn't happen is if time travel was impossible, or my theory of alternate realities is in effect.
If you went back and killed yourself history would be "updated" to where you were murdered... but then what Blackstar is saying, is that if you were murdered before an age where you went back and killed yourself, then you could never go back and kill yourself. What would "really happen" in that scenario is a question of theoretical physics which frankly should give everyone a headache. Sci fi tends to get around this either by ignoring it entirely ( the lazy way ) or having people somehow "shielded" from changes in the timeline (the arguably cheap way) so that they can disrupt it yet not be changed along with the resulting effect.
I tend more towards the chaos theory/alternate decision-branch universe theory. What would happen in that case is anytime you went back in time, you weren't in fact in your own actual past, but in an alternate copy of our universe where you kill yourself, and there is actually no effect upon you or the worldline you came from whatsoever. In the one you're displaced into from time travel, you of course were murdered, but you could return to your own "worldline" and nothing would change for you whatsoever. I think the most "realistic possible" instance of time travel would be more like that... it would only be half time travel, the other half would be basically displacement into an alternate universe. And what happens in one universe would not necessarily have any effect whatsoever on another.
Blackstar meant if there's just one timeline, one universe, then it's impossible to go back and kill yourself, because if you died earlier, you'd never go back and kill yourself. So basically nothing would happen. Only the "alternate reality" idea would make this possible.