Borg vs KE (again)
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
We regularly see people hit with phasers and get knocked backwards by them. Even shotguns and heavy machine guns don't have enough energy to toss a human backwards from a hit.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
We've also seen people "vaporized" by phasers, and to eliminate that many particles from existence would take way more energy than what a small arms weapon puts out.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
This is obviously not due to the impact of the beam itself, but probably some side effect of the chain reaction the beam induces in the target. If it were, then a) the weapon would be knocked out of the firer's hand and b) it would happen every time, not just occasionally.Tyyr wrote:We regularly see people hit with phasers and get knocked backwards by them.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
I do mean the nav deflector, and bear in mind that a personal defensive one doesn't have to be nearly as powerful as one which stops impacts at FTL speeds. Anyway, the point was made that KE shields don't commonly exist - I just pointed out that they are ubiquitous.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
If they were vaporised the resulting cloud of superheated gas would kill everyone in the same room as the victim.stitch626 wrote:We've also seen people "vaporized" by phasers, and to eliminate that many particles from existence would take way more energy than what a small arms weapon puts out.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
Thats why I put the damned thing in quotes.Captain Seafort wrote:If they were vaporised the resulting cloud of superheated gas would kill everyone in the same room as the victim.stitch626 wrote:We've also seen people "vaporized" by phasers, and to eliminate that many particles from existence would take way more energy than what a small arms weapon puts out.
Its been called "vaporized" in the show. But no matter what is done, to remove that many molecules form existence would take more raw energy than any handheld projectile weapon we currently have.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
I've heard two explinations for the "vaporization" effect.
1. What the beam actually does is neutrilize what "holds the body together" on a molecular level, thus reverting the target to free flowing atoms.
2. Shift the target "out of continuim", whatever the hell that means.
1. What the beam actually does is neutrilize what "holds the body together" on a molecular level, thus reverting the target to free flowing atoms.
2. Shift the target "out of continuim", whatever the hell that means.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
Both of which would take huge amounts of energy.Mark wrote:I've heard two explinations for the "vaporization" effect.
1. What the beam actually does is neutrilize what "holds the body together" on a molecular level, thus reverting the target to free flowing atoms.
2. Shift the target "out of continuim", whatever the hell that means.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
That would be true if phasers worked through direct energy transfer. They don't - they're a chain reaction. Ergo, there's no way of determining their power requirements from their effects.stitch626 wrote:Its been called "vaporized" in the show. But no matter what is done, to remove that many molecules form existence would take more raw energy than any handheld projectile weapon we currently have.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
Take it you've never seen a man hit when the bullet doesn't just pass through the body. A 7.62mm round hitting a grown man in the chest plate will easily pick you up off your feet and send you back a few.Tyyr wrote:We regularly see people hit with phasers and get knocked backwards by them. Even shotguns and heavy machine guns don't have enough energy to toss a human backwards from a hit.
Ah, okay.Mikey wrote:I do mean the nav deflector, and bear in mind that a personal defensive one doesn't have to be nearly as powerful as one which stops impacts at FTL speeds. Anyway, the point was made that KE shields don't commonly exist - I just pointed out that they are ubiquitous.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
Aren't they called directed energy weapons at some point?Captain Seafort wrote:That would be true if phasers worked through direct energy transfer. They don't - they're a chain reaction. Ergo, there's no way of determining their power requirements from their effects.stitch626 wrote:Its been called "vaporized" in the show. But no matter what is done, to remove that many molecules form existence would take more raw energy than any handheld projectile weapon we currently have.
Anyway, for the breaking the force between molecules (option 1), that is not self sustaining, so directed energy would be needed.
For shifting out of this continuum (option 2), doing that for one molecule would take an enormous amount of energy.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
If it did, where do you think said energy would go, hmm? Magic itself away? If phasers acted through DET standing next to someone being shot with one would be akin to standing next to a nuke. This would be rather bad for your health.stitch626 wrote:Both of which would take huge amounts of energy.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
Tyyr wrote:We regularly see people hit with phasers and get knocked backwards by them. Even shotguns and heavy machine guns don't have enough energy to toss a human backwards from a hit.
I was hit with a .380 in the left/back of my torso. I was diving for cover at the time, and it had enough force to alter my "flight path". If it would have hit me center mass while on my feet, the concussive force would have easily been enough to stagger me, if not knock me off balance and off my feet.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
That's why they are primarily energy weapons. If a phaser did all that damage by firing a bullet if would toss the firer back as far as it does the target. Phasers don't, they're energy weapons. The knock back could be the result of the a portion of the persons clothes/body vaporizing and sending them backwards. In the end though enough energy is transferred to the target to cause an effect that knocks the target backwards. No man portable firearm can do that.Captain Seafort wrote:This is obviously not due to the impact of the beam itself, but probably some side effect of the chain reaction the beam induces in the target. If it were, then a) the weapon would be knocked out of the firer's hand and b) it would happen every time, not just occasionally.Tyyr wrote:We regularly see people hit with phasers and get knocked backwards by them.
As for it not always happening, phasers have different power settings and in the end its a TV show.
Re: Borg vs KE (again)
For 1) the energy would "disappear" because of being used to counter the energy holding the atoms together (strong and weak nuclear forces).Captain Seafort wrote:If it did, where do you think said energy would go, hmm? Magic itself away? If phasers acted through DET standing next to someone being shot with one would be akin to standing next to a nuke. This would be rather bad for your health.stitch626 wrote:Both of which would take huge amounts of energy.
For 2) into the continuum that the matter went to.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.