Dominion War Redux
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Dominion War Redux
The core makes power by converting matter and antimatter into energy, to create 20kg of armour you would need to burn 20kg of M/AM, and thats assuming you get perfect conversion with no energy lose.
You need an equal amount of mass burned through the core to create that mass on the out side of the ship. Not to mention the fact that armour is made in a matter of seconds!
You need an equal amount of mass burned through the core to create that mass on the out side of the ship. Not to mention the fact that armour is made in a matter of seconds!
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Dominion War Redux
Fair point. Score one for actualy thinking the matter through properly, eh?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
McAvoy wrote:holographic energy absorbing material
Seriously - the term "ablative" means that the armor so described vaporizes upon being struck, carrying off the energy of the attack in that vaporization. It's not a 'Trek application, or whatever - that's what the word means.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Dominion War Redux
To bad Starfleet engineers are dumb as stumps. A projected energy dampener would be great for deactivating shields on an enemy ship as well as it's phasers/disrupters. You don't NEED armor at that point.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
And we've seen such a projector... when?Mark wrote:To bad Starfleet engineers are dumb as stumps. A projected energy dampener would be great for deactivating shields on an enemy ship as well as it's phasers/disrupters. You don't NEED armor at that point.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Dominion War Redux
From a Starfleet ship or in general? The first I don't recall, the second A LOT.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
The comment referred to Starfleet, but to understand your point - "a lot?" There was the Breen weapon, and then...?
Remember we're talking about projecting such a field for use as a ship-to-ship weapon, not just the ability to create such a field.
Remember we're talking about projecting such a field for use as a ship-to-ship weapon, not just the ability to create such a field.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10654
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
- Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh
Re: Dominion War Redux
If you can create such a field doesn't that sort indicate you can use it as a weapon? Sure, the Breen made one you can fire in a cute bolt at someone but the field that trapped the Promellian battlecruiser seemed to have worked pretty well. Sure, having a weapon you can shoot that can pull that trick is nice but even if it had to be stuck on a ship at the ranges they duke it out in Trek I don't see that being a huge drawback.
Re: Dominion War Redux
We've seen energy dampeners screw up hand held weapons all the time right? It "dampens" (or suppresses) the energy from being released is what I'm guessing, so what I'm proposing is a scaled up version. It would be similar to the Breen EMP.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
All true. All has nothing to do with the point. My comment referred specifically to projected such fields in the nature of a directed-energy weapon, which you said we've seen "a lot." I never said that the more static examples you mention aren't useful, only that they don't apply to the reference. It wasn't a value judgement of one over the other.Tyyr wrote:If you can create such a field doesn't that sort indicate you can use it as a weapon? Sure, the Breen made one you can fire in a cute bolt at someone but the field that trapped the Promellian battlecruiser seemed to have worked pretty well. Sure, having a weapon you can shoot that can pull that trick is nice but even if it had to be stuck on a ship at the ranges they duke it out in Trek I don't see that being a huge drawback.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1149
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
What were the relative sizes of the dampener field compared to the weapon? I.e. if a hand-sized weapon was dampened by a building sized generator, what size generator is needed to dampen a starship grade weapon?Mark wrote:We've seen energy dampeners screw up hand held weapons all the time right? It "dampens" (or suppresses) the energy from being released is what I'm guessing, so what I'm proposing is a scaled up version. It would be similar to the Breen EMP.
At that point, which would be better, the dampener, or more regular weaponry?
(Not sure about the specific episodes that would have something like this, does anyone have series, episode names, and the examples from them?)
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
- Granitehewer
- Captain
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Teesside, England
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
surely with the female changling in federation custody, the founders would not risk a war with the federation, after all they viewed odo as more important than the alpha quadrant and plenty of dialogue to suggest that the founders don't believe in individuality in that, each founder when in humanoid form, is still part of the whole, thus they have no reason to value the female founder any less than odo.
mikey, we saw an energy dampener on a ferengi d'kora in tng1: the last outpost, check the script, it was emitted from the rear of the marauder and reduced the galaxy class shields by 30%.
mikey, we saw an energy dampener on a ferengi d'kora in tng1: the last outpost, check the script, it was emitted from the rear of the marauder and reduced the galaxy class shields by 30%.
PTLLS (Tees Achieve), DipHE App Bio (Northumbria), BSc Psychology (Teesside), Comparative Planetology (LJMU), High Energy Astrophysics (LJMU), Mobile Robotics/Physics (Swinburne), Genetics (SAC), Quant Meths (SAC)
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
https://www.facebook.com/PeterBrayshay
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Dominion War Redux
I thought that was just a directed-energy weapon. Didn't the actual loss of shipwide power turn out to be an effect of the T'Kon outpost?Granitehewer wrote:mikey, we saw an energy dampener on a ferengi d'kora in tng1: the last outpost, check the script, it was emitted from the rear of the marauder and reduced the galaxy class shields by 30%.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Dominion War Redux
It was - the Ferengi weapons themselves were described as "mostly electromagnetic".
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.