If only I had thought of thatRK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:The guy was a whiz with transporters. Say he's off at the Daystrom Institute helping refine them or something.
Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6221
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
email, ergo spam
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15379
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Irony considering that the whole point of humanity is bettering yourself.Graham Kennedy wrote:
Trek seems very different in that respect. In fact in Trek, officers in general seem to be incredibly unambitious. They stay in the same job for years on end, and the same rank often for decades. Real world militaries just don't work that way. IIRC, if you don't win promotion in the US after a few years at any given rank, you have to resign.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
- IanKennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6221
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Is it better to have a higher rank? In our culture yes, because it comes with extra pay and prestige. In Trek it likely has some prestige associated with it but certainly not the money. Doing what you do best as well as you can is surely "being the best you can be". How do you better yourself or anyone else around you by doing a job you are perhaps not suited to or able to do as well. I'm not sure that the case.Teaos wrote:Irony considering that the whole point of humanity is bettering yourself.Graham Kennedy wrote:
Trek seems very different in that respect. In fact in Trek, officers in general seem to be incredibly unambitious. They stay in the same job for years on end, and the same rank often for decades. Real world militaries just don't work that way. IIRC, if you don't win promotion in the US after a few years at any given rank, you have to resign.
email, ergo spam
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Well, hopefully promotion within Starfleet is a reflection of becoming wiser, more experienced, and more capable; in turn, one might therefore say that a person who remained at "able seaman" level for 25 years, wasn't becoming any of those things. On the flip side, without the lure of higher pay or an easier lifestyle, that able seaman might be very content to remain right where he was for 25 years.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
A shuttle shifted in the landing bay and... oh... too soon?
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13088
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Great minds think alike. But yeah, one of the better options it seems.IanKennedy wrote:If only I had thought of thatRK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:The guy was a whiz with transporters. Say he's off at the Daystrom Institute helping refine them or something.
- Varthikes
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:40 pm
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Somewhere out there...
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
We do have the example of Picard in the alternate timeline in "Tapestry" in which he never took risks and remained a Lieutenant junior grade for many years. On the other hand, we also have Data who never rose above Lieutenant Commander in 15 years (at least).Mikey wrote:Well, hopefully promotion within Starfleet is a reflection of becoming wiser, more experienced, and more capable; in turn, one might therefore say that a person who remained at "able seaman" level for 25 years, wasn't becoming any of those things. On the flip side, without the lure of higher pay or an easier lifestyle, that able seaman might be very content to remain right where he was for 25 years.
"What has been done has been done and cannot be undone."--Ruth, All the Weyrs of Pern
"Dragons can't change who they are, and who would want them to? Dragons are powerful, amazing creatures."--Hiccup, Dragons: Riders of Berk
"Dragons can't change who they are, and who would want them to? Dragons are powerful, amazing creatures."--Hiccup, Dragons: Riders of Berk
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
It makes you wonder just how many people there are like that in Starfleet. Average-at-best officers who just sit in the same job at the same rank for decade after decade, which is apparently perfectly acceptable.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15379
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
We've seen a few grey haired lieutenants.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13088
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Well, with Data, at least in the admittedly non-canon novels, the Lost Era series he was used mostly as a mobile filing cabinet.Varthikes wrote:We do have the example of Picard in the alternate timeline in "Tapestry" in which he never took risks and remained a Lieutenant junior grade for many years. On the other hand, we also have Data who never rose above Lieutenant Commander in 15 years (at least).Mikey wrote:Well, hopefully promotion within Starfleet is a reflection of becoming wiser, more experienced, and more capable; in turn, one might therefore say that a person who remained at "able seaman" level for 25 years, wasn't becoming any of those things. On the flip side, without the lure of higher pay or an easier lifestyle, that able seaman might be very content to remain right where he was for 25 years.
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
"Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship because while you're there, you can make a difference."Graham Kennedy wrote:It makes you wonder just how many people there are like that in Starfleet. Average-at-best officers who just sit in the same job at the same rank for decade after decade, which is apparently perfectly acceptable.
– James T. Kirk
I think our perceptions on promotions and transfers might be skewed by the particular crews the shows have followed. It came up a number of times that Riker was avoiding promotions and opportunities to become captain of his own ship in order to stay on the Enterprise, and that may be a commonplace occurrence on ships the Federation names Enterprise. On DS9 they were getting promotions, but they started off with lower/different ranks and it's more like they promoted into appropriate ranks for the roles they took on. On Voyager an occasional point of contention was that Janeway didn't hand out many (any?) promotions because she needed/wanted to maintain a standard chain of command and rank structure.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Certainly VOY was a unique situation; on DS9, with the example of Sisko specifically, I imagine that command of a (at the time) backwater space station was slotted for the rank of commander, if not lt. commander. Remember, even in the RL USN, smaller boats are captained by officers who have not attained the rank of captain.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Major USN ships like a carrier have major position's filled with high ranking officers. I believe the Head Engineering officer (whatever his title is) is Captain. The CAG, commander of th air group stationed on the carrier is also a captain.
Squadrons are commanded by Commanders.
In Trek we see senior officers being filled by Lt. Junior Grade officers. We also see a fleet filled by mostly officers unless the enlisted areally treated like peasants and have to crawl to their stations/barracks by the use of the Jeffries Tube because their filth might dirty up the clean interiors of the ship.
Squadrons are commanded by Commanders.
In Trek we see senior officers being filled by Lt. Junior Grade officers. We also see a fleet filled by mostly officers unless the enlisted areally treated like peasants and have to crawl to their stations/barracks by the use of the Jeffries Tube because their filth might dirty up the clean interiors of the ship.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Source
"I would say there's no replacing him,” Star Trek producer J.J. Abrams told Postmedia Network of hiring another actor to replace the late Anton Yelchin as Pavel Chekov in the already-greenlit sequel to “Star Trek Beyond.”
“There's no recasting. I can't possibly imagine that, and I think Anton deserves better. ... I have thought about (how he'll be replaced), we're working on it, and it's too early to talk about it."
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Re: Anton Yelchin (New Checkov) dead
Now that special effects have come a long way, perhaps they could replace Chekov with Arex from TAS
Bite my shiny metal ass